Right or wrong.... - Page 17

indeed, "when you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."

i think this is going to be my new quote.

faster and better.

quote:

---

it does take logic deductive and analisis(all words for thinking) but why cant we do that while we are feeling all those emotion that make us want what we want for the moment we want them.

---

We do to extent or another,
Autistic child returns to center, he is angry, not wanting to be left there. Previously he has found that he will be removed from the vehicle so he transfers his anger to another wheel chair bound woman by striking out at her. During his visits, he had pulled TV's, pictures from the walls, etc. yet that he chooses the way in which he transfers his anger (hurt) seeking to make you angry as he. One logically justifies ones actions, although the logic may be flawed his actions show that they are not random.

What about the taking of a human life?

I believe that noone has the right to take another human life.
Also there is no circumstance where it is acceptable to kill another human. .No circumstance[b]

i feel emotionally for that view as well.. but when i think of how we discrimnate against (kill with no conseequences) a fly or whatever i feel revengful and sometimes wish the death and or torture of humans in reaction to our behaviour to non=human living things such as flies..

killing is ok, as long as they have a reason, ay reason at all.

Killing is ok under certain circumstances. Because if it is ok then logically you would have no recourse because the action itself is OK, you only have recourse against an action if you can deem it bad

no. i have no recourse with any action. i just dont like it when someone tries to hurt me or someone i care about.... look we are going in circles. please find anotheer piont because you dont understand me, and i cant explain it correctly.

Your whole theory seems based on 'if it feels good do it' and that is some of the lowest philosphical reasoning

why? and im not a pholosipher. ive never took a class, or read a book on it. this is just how i think.

if it feels good do it is simply a lack of reasoning that permits every activity no matter how vile as long as it can be gotten away with.

not gotten away with. but accepted in society as an action that had its meaning.

But you do not like the idea of social standards.

i didnt say i was right, just that it didnt apeal. i kno that they are a must in todays society, but i still dont like them. i except them and respect them for their porpouse.

But society is too lazy to maintain standards. for example it is not good for community to have its members be sexually promiscuous but this happens all the time.