What do you think of this?

Shibus four step hypothesis of the fundamental relation between objects.


I created this elaborate system that I believe stands true not just for the human mind based on Carl Jung, but also for any two objects in the universe. Remember, its just a hypothesis.

1) I do not make a distinction between humans and objects since i consider humans to be simply complex objects.

2) I believe that objects are either drawn towards, or they draw towards themselves.

3) I think objects draw into themselves either control or freedom, or draw towards control or freedom.

4) I think the purpose they do this is so that they may either grow, or they may survive.

In this, i do not assume objects have the ability to think, but rather, that they are either drawn towards, and draw in.

here, these definitions are parallel with Jung
with,

1) introversion being a drawing in.
2) extraversion being a drawing out.
3) controls being judgment.
4) freedom being perception.
5) survival being thinking and sensing.
6) growth being feeling and intuition.

Also, as i mull my hypothesis, I've noticed a intuitive pattern

Drawing in seems negative
Drawing toward seems positive

Control seems negative (inabilities)
Freedom seems positive (abilities)

Survival seems negative
Growth seems positive

Also, I would like to mention that all objects may display both negative and positive depending on the situation

If only there was a way to mathematically express this.

since i can't prove this for the natural world, I'll have to satisfy myself by using this hypothesis as a personality model instead

Though i do suspect it works in parallel with the natural world

You refer to yourself as "I" which is subjective therefore your first hypothesis is a contradiction of terms because if humans are simply just complex objects then the simple complex object, you, just violated it by implication of subjectivity.