data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d79f/0d79f753a390a42771a5ad0e7b6e6bf417794ef7" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ddb/37ddbfe56121bc64c7d917b49ba391d9c57e04aa" alt="" 39yrs • M • data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c6c0/6c6c0f04dcd53c052dcb157e61b91d16a7da5b77" alt="Add friend"
A CTL of 1 means that wittgensteins is a contributing member of Captain Cynic. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75fcd/75fcdc75380b8053eedb0439d2bfafa294bd6990" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/501a6/501a6dd3016c3b5ab21a52d9675b694273471585" alt="" |
Postmodernism Disrobed |
Juts wondering what people think about the terrible state Continetal Philsophy's in. A couple years ago a kind of intellectual expose was published by two physicists, Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont (called Intellectual Impostors). They zoroed in on the flagrant mis-use of scientific ideas, but the deliberately off-centre, obscurantist, muddle-headed melange of half-baked ideas should be there for anyone to see. The most shocking is not that anyone thought to write like this, but that it was accepted and became in-vogue. Just to give you as taste, here is a passage from one of Felix Guattari's 'works': We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal corresposndence between linear signfifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multi-refrential, multi-dminesional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive nature of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of excluded middle and reinforce in us our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticized previously.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d79f/0d79f753a390a42771a5ad0e7b6e6bf417794ef7" alt="" |