quote:
Now let me ask you something, I notice you enjoy putting people down on many post. Does this make you feel as if your smart?
No.
quote:
If you don't know how to give an intelligent response, why belittle yourself with the manner of responses that you so often choose?
Your inability to percieve intelligence in a post or poster is not indicative of them lacking intelligence.
However, on the other hand, if there is intelligence in the post and the poster that you cannot percieve, it could very well serve as proof of a lack of intelligence on your part.
quote:
It just makes you look all the more ignorant.
How I look, especially to new people who don't know me, is of l no concern to me.
It has been proven time and time again that, for the most part, regardless of being nice or nasty people will favor people when they are in agreement and make negative judgements when disagreements occur when basing such judgements soley on attitude and emotion rather than actual content.
There are plenty, thankfully, who have ascended beyond being stuck in such a juvenile mentality, rather than like myself choosing to engage in juvenile behavior intentionally, and can openly and easily discern between what is being said and how it is being said.
quote:
And if you really believe most of the things you reply, then I ask you again, what makes you think you're so smart?
Who has made claims of me thinking myself so smart? Me? No, you. So your question is null and void.
And I'm going to address something, again, here now that I haven't had the chance in the past week or two due to work and computer issues.
The above quote has an generalized hypothetical used to illustrate a direct question.
This is quite unproductive, you do a lot, and I have been given reason to believe that you may not even understand what I'm talking about.
Nonetheless, if you want to tell me that you think I'm wrong about something or have a question about something in particular, you are going to need to specify and stop intentionally or unwittingly hiding behind your selective ambiguity.
quote:
And if you really believe most of the things you reply
Things like what?
quote:
You say you have 52 months of comments, so how does that mean anything?
Quite simple, hell, I'll even let you answer yourself with one of the only accurate statements I've heard from you.
quote:
It just means you have voiced your opinion for 52 months, not that anything you have posted or commented on is right or wrong, it just means you have commented for 52 months.
What would be fascinatingly ironic, but due to its common occurance in respect to the attempts made to converse with you, it is not, is that you were trying to call my statement pointless when it was your own that was.
And the only reason you felt you had a point, is likely due to the evidenced point that you didn't understand what I was saying, or else you wouldn't have been able to unwittingly answer your own question with my answer for me, and that you were assumptively inferring inaccurate meaning to what I did say.
Which again demonstrates exactly what I've been bring up to you about you since our first correspondence.
A point that has yet to be properly addressed because of your refusal to make specific and direct responses or any inquery of substance to add to your understanding of the situation before just digging in your heels to defend your assumptive assertions and generalized nonsense.
quote:
Maybe you can explain to me and everyone else here why you think you're so gifted?
See this, this is both pointless and childish.
If it were at least a contextually viable pointed jab with some relevance to any conversation that has taken place, it would serve a purpose, but since my intellect and "gifts" were never a point or claim made in any topic of discussion, it simply is not the case.
And it is made even more rediculous due to the fact that the only time you have asked such ingenuous questions was to try to question my qualifications to make statements of opinion, as we have agreeably determined, which is both sad and pathetic.
quote:
Or why you feel your IQ is so far superior to that of everyone else on here because I got to tell you I'm just not seeing it all, in fact just the opposite.
Wow, really, more?
Having insecurities about the size of your IQ?
Tell me, how does one SEE anothers IQ? This is a rhetorical question, by the way.
Again, if I had made any such claim, this question might mean something other than you projecting your fears of some threat to your own obviously dearly held perception of your own intellect.
As it stands though, it simply serves to...
quote:
just make you look all the more ignorant.
And to reiterate a point, as it would appear repitition holds some place of importance to you...
quote:
Your inability to percieve intelligence in a post or poster is not indicative of them lacking intelligence.
However, on the other hand, if there is intelligence in the post and the poster that you cannot percieve, it could very well serve as proof of a lack of intelligence on your part.
quote:
I'll even go one step further, your grammar is lacking any true structure, so I know it can't be that.
Thankfully intelligence is not restricted by knowledge nor grammar, even if IQ numbers based on excessively proven skewed and inaccurate tests are.
Which, by the way, I have no idea what my IQ is, and in case you are wondering, or sorry, more likely assuming, my point about IQ tests is not from my own assertions but from what I was taught by psychology professors, so take it up with someone else if you have an issue with it, I'm just relaying information.
quote:
And your ability to articulate a simple thought in a written form needs help big time.
Hmmm, tis truly difficult indeed, when someone just doesn't understand things in their simplest forms.
Do you know what a naturalman is yet?
My Posts
29yrs • M • 
I embrace all religions of all kinds, and so I belong to none. 
