Science is prooving the Bible - Page 2

The moon is younger than earth~~> http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/older_earth_020828.html

The earth is OLDER than the solar system~~> http://www.spacedaily.com/news/carbon-04d.html

Again, science proofs the Bible.

And the stars? Are they older? Secondly you're full of bullshit that article says some carbonis older then the solar system, not the Earth itself.

And Darwin does he agree with the bible.

Honestly you guys drive me crazy. Your beliefs may be right, but to pretend science systematically proves the bible is the most basic lie.

Teen you sound like one of those christians defending their believe in GOD as an absolute truth!
As you said science doesn't claim to have the absolute truth but is coming to recongnize the truth.
I looked at the links & as usual was baffled more by what theoretical assumtion they were using to promote the conclusions they make?

quote:

---

Earth reached mature size 30 million years after the Sun's birth, the two independent results show. This is in line with the leading theoretical model and most other indicators.

---

So how did they concluded that the sun is older? According to their theories, right but then have they proven their basic theory, no. But some theories do seem to lead to similar conclusions as the bible?

" But some theories do seem to lead to similar conclusions as the bible?"
These are either complete coincidence or purposely misreading the bible.

quote:

---

These are either complete coincidence or purposely misreading the bible.

---

Right, Absolutely as in the bginning so shall it be in the end? Doesn't Revelation say something about like that as well.

One way to prove something is true is by making predictions with it. Science makes predictions every day, from the trajectory of a meteor to the odds of having diabetes.

If science and the Bible agreed all along, WHY DIDN'T THE BIBLE MAKE THESE PREDICTIONS?

ya, the bible does make some predictions of events that occured as well.
Oh by the way, I was wondering about the creation theory, do stars include all stars or was it indicative of those producing radiation only in the visible region of light?
As the ancient people knew only the points of lights as stars
& you were not specific in your comments?

"ya, the bible does make some predictions of events that occured as well. "
I'm not talking about events. If the bible says the same thing as science, why does the bible not predict the same things science does?

"As the ancient people knew only the points of lights as stars
& you were not specific in your comments?"
Ancient peoples would only know those points as stars, yes. Though it changes nothing, the almost all stars visible or not were created before the sun. So this is moot.

As a sidenote was man created before or after animals?

quote:

---

why does the bible not predict the same things science does?

---

Man didn't understand what he was given, let alone the deep things of GOD.

quote:

---

Though it changes nothing, the almost all stars visible or not were created before the sun

---

Interesting concept but why do you think that is true? I would tend to think they came to exist in unison.
sidenote: tend toward man the animal like the stars was created within the same aspect of time. But Native Tradition does agree with biblical text as man being last & therefore learned from the other creature beings to survive.

" Man didn't understand what he was given, let alone the deep things of GOD. "
Scientists are obviously better communicators then.

" Interesting concept but why do you think that is true? I would tend to think they came to exist in unison. "
Well it all depends on when the hydrogen clouds came together. Since all the earth's materials came from a star, there was a star before our sun and earth.

"But Native Tradition does agree with biblical text as man being last & therefore learned from the other creature beings to survive."
But according to genesis "2:18
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. 2:19
And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air;"

Finally, why do you believe whatever indians or an old book say?

I agree extremelly with Dumbteen on this topic.

He makes good points and disproves theories that you guys are putting forward.

And what most people don't seem to realise, that the Thread title is "Science is prooving the bible" or some other sort of nonsense, but that is incorrect, Science is never the strongest proof, due to the fact every scientist has their bias' and interpretaions of the things they read, see, discover etc...
so for all we know, the people who wrote those articles, are biased and belive in God, therefore are going to be more leiniant (spelling?) towards that end of this arugmentative spectrum on this topic.

Therefore....this thread is shit
and a waste of time.

And if anything, science proves that God didnt make the world, and that it was a natural occurance, following the life of planets, stars and entire solar systems, which have been proved and approved by practically any scientist from high school - professers, with half a brain. (well the majority that is, and therefore, accepted.)

Ahthankyouverymuch

quote:

---

Scientists are obviously better communicators then.

---

Evidently not so because those intelligent types still haven't been able to teach the masses nil of some 2000 years of scientific studies!

quote:

---

Finally, why do you believe whatever indians or an old book say?

---

Because in understand enough of science to know their self-deceptions from the truth.

quote:

---

Ahthankyouverymuch

---

http://www.captaincynic.com/thread.php3/thrdid=13397-u-frmid=17-u-page=2

"I think where science and religion meet we find a greater good." They rarely agree. The limiting factor being human understanding.

"Evidently not so because those intelligent types still haven't been able to teach the masses nil of some 2000 years of scientific studies!"
Are you insane? They taught us to make guns, cars, bombs, the lightbulb, toothpaste, antibiotics on and on.

God has done nothing but give us an excuse to kill people.

You see what I am saying?

" Because in understand enough of science to know their self-deceptions from the truth. "
So if science is wrong some indians are therefore right? Even though you still haven't shown how science is self-deceiving. Religion does that, it pretends to be absolute eternal truth, science knows its probably wrong, awaiting its disproval.

quote:

---

Are you insane? They taught us to make guns, cars, bombs, the lightbulb, toothpaste, antibiotics on and on.

---

Look at the post in the science section, how many of these show evidence that the author has any comprehension of the substance (scientific theory) for the developement & use of those listed?

quote:

---

God has done nothing but give us an excuse to kill people.

---

That is correct, "an excuse" not a validated action of the godly (those seeking to live the life, not the lie)!

quote:

---

So if science is wrong some indians are therefore right?

---

Science doesn't have much to say about some aspects of life so you go where those aspects are taught to round out your understanding (education)?
. . .dindin . . continued later

"Look at the post in the science section, how many of these show evidence that the author has any comprehension of the substance (scientific theory) for the developement & use of those listed?"
Of course people don't know how it works. But from scientific theory, some can learn. With biblical dogma, NO ONE has learned anything about how our universe actually works.