3 Types Of People - Page 2

Yes. That is the dictonary definition. I have taken a broader meaning of the word in this explenation. What I mean is someone who likes to be in pain/controled. And patape, I think you are right, this may be to broad of catagories.

Well a generalization is to an extent expectation of such but perhaps alittle refining would be indictative to the dicussion?

I think that these catagories are fine. They cover both extreme ends of the spectrum, with one in the middle. But as you said cynicalm, patape does have a point. You need more catagories to specifise the 3 broader groups.

I've come to believe it depends on the person. Though a select few may be all three, I find myself stuck mainly to Sadism. Or Sado-Masochism if anything. I will rule the world one day, but though, making everyone elses lives miserable is on the top of the list, inflicting pain isn't my only thought. I do... enjoy the reaction, but I find myself caught in between that and trying to please my friends. Perhaps, these conflicting stereotypes reveal the ending of my sanity. <3

I agree. I believe that everyone wants to be unique but you'll have to realize that there are others like you.not you but like you.

I kind of find myself in all three--alittle more in the "helpfuls" category. But I also like to just sit and watch others, I like being by myself alot of the times and I don't like to boss people, I don't submit to others in an extent like a dog would, and I do help others. But for most parts, I'm just bymyself with no one to boss or obey or help.

i just found this descusion randomly whilst "surfing the net" and im thinking why the hell is it needed for people to be limited to a specific group that somebody has made up whilst being bored?!?! im only giving my opinion so dont take an ofense but it seems that these groups are made for people who hav had past troubles in their lives and feel alone so to speak. your taking for granted the ability to just be urself and give life a go, it cant be all that bad. also what group do people who get over there dilemas and move on go into, the people who are genrally happy! and that is possible by the way.

Well what about the people who want to live their lives uncontrolled, but want to help society in a way that it is benefited?

Of course this theory is true. Everybody must fall into one of those categories, because there is no other cattegory for man to fall in. Someone will either rule, be ruled, or help rule. I suppose that you may, if you don't consider this falling in the cattegory of he who must rule, be a non-comformotist, or in other words one who simply refuses to be ruled and who will revolt against any system that tries to rule him.

rather a broad statement or does it apply to our learned social values? Other cultures may not think in these terms.

There are in fact, three types of people.

Pussys,Dicks,and Assholes.

Pussys dont like Dicks because Dicks fuck pussys..but dicks fuck Assholes too. The reason pussys and assholes dont like eachother is because sometimes, Dicks fuck assholes and pussys get shit for it....

But if we didnt have any dicks, assholes would shit on pussys...

imo, the 3 types of people are:

introverts, extraverts, and those that interchange between the 2....

There are many philosophies regarding things that come in bands of three, in my culture, the concept of three types can describe as such:
There are regarded in VEDIC philosophy three different types of people based on how they react to the world around them and within (the mind),
The first type are those people that see "SWARTH" - this word describes selfisness and desire to obtain only profit for onseself without regard for others.
The second type are those people that see "ARTH" - this word desrcibes the meaning of something in perhaps a philosphical or scientific sence and describes people that seek the worldly meaning of everything.
The third and final type are those people that see "PARMATH" - this word is closely related with GOD and describes someone who sees or seeks the devine and absolute purpose or meaning of all things, the ultimate reality perhaps!
An example of this is as follows - imagin three people in a scenario - The first person is walking down the road eating a banana, once he has finished he throws the peel on the ground without a care for what problems it may create (tripping) for others - this is an example of "SWARTH". The second person walks down the road and sees the banana peel lying on the ground, fearing that someone may slip on it and hurt themselves he picks it up with great responsibility and puts it in the trash - This is an example of "ARTH". The third person comes along and sees a cow that is hungry, he also notices that there is a banana peel in the trash - what is in-edible for a human can still be consumed by a cow, therfore what is of no use to us isnt necessarily of no use to others, hence - he picks up the banana peel and feeds it to the cow - this is an example of "PARMATH".

This is a rather long article and probably doesnt appeal to hardly anyone these days, SO ANYONE IS FREE TO CRITISISE AS IM SURE MANY WILL!

And if you want to refer to societal structure there are another three types of people...High, Middle, Low....