Wes Clark For President

Why, because he served in the military and knows the real cost of war. Some say he is not a good candidate because he has eagerly supported presidents in the past in their poor decision making. But if you have ever served in the military you know that your duty is to support the president. In the military they teach that good leadership is the ability to make everyone under you believe that all orders past down came from you personally. Obviously Wes Clark has proven himself a good leader, those who use this against him never served in the military, those of us who did know better.

I believe that most of you will vote Democrat even if your not a Democratic, (like me) so that we can once again have a government for the people, something that past administrations had taken from us and the democrats promise to give it back to us. I don't suspect all of you will vote for Wes Clark, I'm just sharing my decision.

I have always voted. But never before have I ever contributed to a presedential campian except for the two dollars you give at tax time. I've given 25.00 to the Wes Clark campain and I might give more. If we want to take this country back, we have to pay for it.

VOTE - Democrat, Republican - it don't matter - VOTE, because you can.

Roger Harkness

Damn, right. We Clark all the way.

I believe that we already made this thread before, but I agree with you about the voting part, I have to read up more on Wesley Clark before making a decision, but he does look like a capable candidate.

My only issue is whether or not a military man like himself can resist his natural instict to go to war, and this is a very important angle presently with not only the Iraq stuff, but the N. Korea shit.

If you had made an earlier post, I'm sorry I missed it.

I've made this point earlier and will make it again. Bush Sr fought in the war, he didn't take us to Iraq. Bush Jr never went to war and was eager to take us there.

People who have been there know the real cost and are not so willing to go back there. No one knows war more than Mr. Clark. If you want to find out more abour Mr. Clark, this is his web page. http://www.clark04.com/

I have further to add:

<!------------- Mr. Future President General Clark --------------------->
<br><center><a href="http://www.theinsideout.us/Clark04_Leader_hi.mpeg"> If on dialup, right click and select save to download. This is an Mpeg of what Mr. Clark has to say about iraq.<img src="http://www.theinsideout.us/clark04_468x60.gif"></center><br>
<!------------ Mr. Future President General Clark --------------------->

Whether you agree or not - Please Vote.

If you do agree and you have a web page. You can copy and paste this into your page. : )

I don't really support any of the candidates I've heard of so far, but I guess Clark would either be my second or first choice if I absolutely had to choose. I mostly agree with what you say. When you've seen war yourself I'm sure it's harder to send men into the meat grinder.

But sorry, I'm afraid Bush is probably the most likely to win unless there is a huge turn of events very soon. The Saddam capture boosted him quite a bit, even though that was a single, practically insignifcant event in the progress in Iraq. Who ever thought things would turn out this bad with that Texan fool back when he got elected?

You're probably right about Bush. It seems everyone on the Internet is against him, and so it was about war with Iraq, but yet the general public had gone the otherway. I guess the general public isn't on the web yet.

The media is saying that Bush is popular. It is even being said that if you believe in God you will vote for Bush. I guess if that happens I'm going to have to find me a rock. Because I very much believe in God and I very much don't believe in Bush.