Indeed he can come off as a lunatic. But I understand his brand of lunacy.
And fortunately, since there already is a Chompsky, there is an Alex Jones to balance him, specifically I refer to how Noam is not likely to sneak into a highly secure elite meeting ground where questionable practices ensue and get some film of it.
I find Alex far more pro active and passionate about his cause, I'm sure age and Texas may have something to do with it. But I can't help the impression of sincerety. Could be a false impression, but I agree with his message and see where he is coming from, including his reactions, so I can stand those moments where its like, get to the point, stop repeating yourself, and dear god, calm down.
Alex is a blowhard, blowhards get heard. And when your dealing with subject matter that everybody is trying to keep quiet, sometimes you just gotta get loud.
He represents to me the type of passionate clarity and conviction that people wished, and some believed, they were getting from Bush after 9/11, as well as the irony that were Bush sincere and concerned about 9/11 he'd be asking such questions, instead of warning of not tolerating outrageous conspiracy theories, and then of course cracking down on domestic suveylance, primarily of dissedent groups, which he is somehow convincing factions of law inforcement that they are terrorist groups.
Once you become familiar with his archive of information, when he speaks you can just see all the information he's trying to spit out any time he opens his mouth, its frustrating, even as a listener. There's just no way to encaspulate everything without sounding like a raving lunatic.
Quiet or loud, if Noam or Alex says something to the effect that the US Government had anything to do with 9/11 people call them nuts, left wing, right wing, nuts.
But I agree he needs to learn to be more professional more consistently if he intends to truly be taken seriously.