Micheal Jackson-Guilty or Innocent? - Page 2

whether you have faith in the system or not is your problem, but the fact is it's the system that is set up, so if you don't like it then do something to try and change it....otherwise, if the jurors in that courtroom found him not guilty, then he's not guilty, period....

just because someone says he's not guilty doesnt mean he didnt do it.......anyway, this is pointless.......

it is pointless. he is innocent, the courts have decided so.

quote:

---

but wonder in a way because of the first time he was accused. Why did he choose to pay off his first accuser? Thats the only move he made that had be doubting him. I would fight tooth and nail to prove my innocence instead of paying a little "Hush Money" to his accuser.

---

Thats because the parents of the accuser (who we're behind it all, mind you) asked for the money. Thats all it was about, thats all they wanted. Contrary to popular beleif, it was not "hush money". A true parent would not ask for money if their child was violated in anyway.

Michael is innocent. (And its Michael. Not Micheal).

that faget is guilty .